<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash Now Visible To Search. Wow!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.eightblack.com/2008/flash-now-visible-to-search-wow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.eightblack.com/2008/flash-now-visible-to-search-wow/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on sales, marketing and the internet.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Des Walsh</title>
		<link>http://blog.eightblack.com/2008/flash-now-visible-to-search-wow/#comment-63288</link>
		<dc:creator>Des Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 13:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eightblack.com/?p=607#comment-63288</guid>
		<description>Bugger! No more curled lip, no more supercilious half smile, no more "Huh, Flash! Can't be found of course. Must have cost them a bomb and they can't be found."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugger! No more curled lip, no more supercilious half smile, no more &#8220;Huh, Flash! Can&#8217;t be found of course. Must have cost them a bomb and they can&#8217;t be found.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Lane</title>
		<link>http://blog.eightblack.com/2008/flash-now-visible-to-search-wow/#comment-61973</link>
		<dc:creator>George Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.eightblack.com/?p=607#comment-61973</guid>
		<description>Interesting... So search engines can now "read" flash objects... and all the major online video properties encode their videos using flash.

Is the next step form here indexing video files? 

Will YouTube &#38; Google videos be ranked by what's actually going on IN the video rather than just by the title tags etc? For relevancy and ad serving, this would be enormous.

Thanks for the heads up on this one Simon, I'll be watching this story carefully.

Cheers,


George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; So search engines can now &#8220;read&#8221; flash objects&#8230; and all the major online video properties encode their videos using flash.</p>
<p>Is the next step form here indexing video files? </p>
<p>Will YouTube &amp; Google videos be ranked by what&#8217;s actually going on IN the video rather than just by the title tags etc? For relevancy and ad serving, this would be enormous.</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up on this one Simon, I&#8217;ll be watching this story carefully.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
